![]() Unfortunately we have far too many who do not. The only people who should be on that court, and every damn court in the land when you get right down to it, are those who uphold that document to the letter. Except that the one thing that never changes is human nature, which is what that brilliant document was designed to defend against. Leftists argue, mostly disingenuously I might add, that times change and the Constitution must change with the vicissitudes of technology, culture and so on. As for the SCOTUS, this is just yet another in a nearly endless number of examples of why this notion of "a living and breathing Constitution" and the need for "balance" on the court is totally dead wrong. Well, if you still refuse to believe that elections can be rigged, here's one way in which you can plainly see how they are "fortified." And I don't mean with 12 essential vitamins and minerals, either. And that’s how elections are lost before they even happen. “Moreover, notice how the three leftist Democrats on the Court never break when it comes to major decisions important to the Democrats, regardless of the Constitution’s text and the framers’ intent,” he added.ĭemocrats never betray their principles (such as they are), but Republicans seem to do so frequently. Leftists now know that they can manipulate some of the Supreme Court “conservative” justices by flattering them, Levin warned. So much for the “conservative” Supreme Court. Only Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented from the majority opinion. “So, now the Framers’ and ratifiers’ clear language in the Constitution about state legislatures (not state governors or state courts) having the final say on electoral matters is the interpretation of right-wing kooks,” he asked sarcastically. With the 2024 election being such a crucial election, as Democrat-created crime, border, and economic crises plague America, this was a terrible decision from the Supreme Court. The lawlessness continues, and the Court has opened even further the interference in our elections by activist bureaucrats and courts, and the controversy that will continue to ensue, for as long as this unraveling republic exists.” “They intended absolutely nothing by that language. ![]() ”he Supreme Court just ruled that those who wrote the Constitution, adopted it, and ratified it really didn’t mean for final authority to rest with the state legislatures,” Levin explained. “ Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett are truly pathetic.” Mark Levin, both affectionately and derisively referred to around these parts as "Old Yeller" went off with much deserved sound and fury: “Today’s ruling keeps alive the left-wing drive to abuse the courts for partisan gain, but it is no blank check for judges to embrace Marc Elias’ fringe and novel legal theories in order to skew the rules of democracy in favor of the Left.” Constitution’s elections clause “does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules regarding federal elections.” But it also failed to defend state legislatures’ constitutional right to control elections law, including redistricting, as shielded from court review.įor the first time, the Supreme Court has ruled definitively that there is a limit to the power of state courts to interpret election law,” said Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, in a statement. Harper decision, SCOTUS held that the U.S. The ruling does not, however, entirely stymie activist attempts to use courts to override elected legislators’ decisions about election law. Supreme Court issued a ruling that limited state courts’ ability to wrest control of elections law from state legislatures in a North Carolina redistricting case. Well, with supposedly conservative/originalist justices like these who needs court-packing? “In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Which Is Better - To Be Ruled By One ONT Three Thousand Miles Away, Or Bt Three Thousand ONTs One Mile Away? THE MORNING RANT: Media Smear Merchants, Jason Aldean, and Racism By Historic Association (“Show Me the Man or Video, and I’ll Find You the Racism”) Partisan Special Counsel Brings More Charges Against Trump, While the Special Counsel Investigating Joe and Hunter Biden Brings No Charges, Because He Does Not Exist We Have Indisputable Scientific Evidence, Declared by a Panel of "Experts," That Joe Biden Is As Healthy as a Communist Figurehead Can Be Regime Media: Ignore What You Can See and Hear With Your Own Eyes. The White House Demanded That FaceBook Censor Posts About Vanccines and a Post by America's Most Prominent Journalist and Commentator, Tucker Carlson New York Times Celebrates: The Wealthy That We Serve Will Pay Less For Luxurious Vacations Because of All the Illegal Aliens Working For Low Wages at Spas and Resorts
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |